Skip to main content
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Sign In
Breadcrumb Links

The Rounds

Medical Staff News & Kudos 
 
ACS:
Ambulatory Care Services has committed to support the inpatient pavilions in an effort to decompress the increase in patient acuity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. ACS continues to work to improve communication and patient care between specialty and primary care departments by expanding their e-consult platform to more specialties and expanding the conditions that can be managed through e-consult. Orders were created to get patients with urgent conditions specialty referrals within 24-72 hours, with immediate referral from primary care or emergency center to specialty care. Primary care clinicians have volunteered to staff the temporary patient care tent located next to the LBJ EC. One of the main additions to the ACS platform was the quick development of a Telehealth Department to provide technical support, and the platform continues to expand to more specialties.  These ACS initiatives are examples of our Strategic Plan Pillar 3: One Harris Health System.
 
Ben Taub: 
In August 2021, Harris Health with Baylor College of Medicine launched a new clinical program at Ben Taub, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, (TAVR). This procedure is a less-invasive option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (narrowing of the aortic valve) as an alternative to valve replacement done via open-heart surgery. TAVR typically offers a shorter hospital stay and minimal scarring as compared with valve replacement done through open surgery. The Heart Team is comprised of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, imaging specialists, anesthesiologists, nurses, advanced practice providers and the valve program coordinator. The team assesses the patient’s medical condition, determines the best course of treatment and walks alongside the patient through their treatment course.  This multidisciplinary approach supports Pillar 1: Quality and Patient Safety. To date, the team has completed three procedures and is establishing a referral protocol for Harris Health cardiologists.
 
LBJ: 
On Sept. 16, 2021, LBJ Hospital's Emergency Center was awarded a Bronze Standard Level 3 Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation (GEDA). The recognition was a multidisciplinary effort undertaken while the LBJ Emergency continues to see over 6,000 patient encounters monthly. The interdisciplinary team, led by Charles Maddow, MD, and Meghan Myers, BSN, RN, brought to focus the unique needs of elderly adults who present to emergency departments. This initiative aligns with Harris Health System's Pillar 4: Population Health. In the LBJ Emergency Center, interdisciplinary teams assess elderly patients for special needs, coordinate their care with hospital and community resources, and work toward smooth transitions of care. Connecting the patient with the care resources and equipment while providing education to the hospital and broader community are just some of the best practices stemming from the accreditation.
 
Recognition:
Congratulations, Dr. John Saunders (ACS), who achieved a 100% patient satisfaction score for the second quarter.

​Dr. John Saunders
 

What is “High Reliability?"
Harris Health System will become a high-reliability organization (HRO) with quality and patient safety as its core values where ZERO HARM is not only a possibility, but an expectation. So what is High Reliability?

  • Reliability: A probability that a system will produce a specific result expressed as a ratio (e.g., 99%) or frequency (1 per year).
  • High Reliability Organization: An organization that has succeeded in avoiding catastrophes in an environment where normal accidents can be expected due to risk factors and complexity.

MDs Doing Wrong-Site Surgery: Why Is It Still Happening?

In July 2021, University Hospitals, in Cleveland, Ohio, announced that its staff had transplanted a kidney into the wrong patient. In April 2020, an interventional radiologist at Boca Raton Regional Hospital, in Florida, was sued for allegedly placing a stent into the wrong kidney of an 80-year-old patient. Using fluoroscopic guidance, the doctor removed an old stent from the right side but incorrectly replaced it with a new stent on the left side.

Wrong-site surgery ― surgery performed on the wrong patient, the wrong body part, or the wrong side of the body ― is a rare but distressing event and garners much attention when it happens.

"The problem is that it is so rare that doctors don't focus on it," says Mary R. Kwaan, MD, a colorectal surgeon at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

A 2006 study estimated that 25 to 52 wrong-site surgeries were performed each week in the United States. In 2013, 2.7% of patients who were involved in wrong-site surgeries died and 41% experienced some type of permanent injury. The mean malpractice payment was $127,000.  Some malpractice payments are much higher. In 2013, a Maryland ob/gyn paid a $1.42 million malpractice award for removing the wrong ovary from a woman in 2009. In 2017, a Pennsylvania urologist paid $870,000 for removing the wrong testicle from a man in 2013.

Wrong-Site Surgery Often Involves Experienced Surgeons
One might think that wrong-site surgeries usually involve younger or less-experienced surgeons, but that's not the case; two-thirds of the surgeons who perform wrong-site surgeries are in their 40s and 50s, compared with fewer than 25% younger than 40.

In a rather chilling statistic, in a 2013 survey, 12.4% of doctors who were involved in sentinel events in general had claims for more than one event. In a study reported in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Spine, 25% of orthopedic surgeons reported performing at least one wrong-site surgery during their career. Within orthopedics, spine surgery is ground zero for wrong-site surgery. "Finding the site in spine surgery can be more difficult than in common left-right orthopedic procedures," says Joseph A. Bosco III, a New York City orthopedist.

It's Not Just the Surgeon's Mistake
Mistakes are not only made by the surgeon in the operating room (OR). They can be made by staff when scheduling a surgery, radiologists and pathologists when writing their reports for surgery, and by team members in the OR. Many people are prone to confusing left and right. A 2020 study found that 14.9% of people had difficulty distinguishing left from right; other studies have shown higher rates. Distractions increase the likelihood of mistakes.

A Push to Eliminate Wrong-Site Surgery
In 2009, the Joint Commission encouraged hospitals to make root-cause analyses not only of wrong-site surgeries but also of near misses, which are much more plentiful. It used the insights gained to change surgical routines and protocols. The Safe Surgery Project, a collaboration between the Joint Commission's Center for Transforming Healthcare and eight hospitals and surgery centers, reduced the number of errors and near misses by 46% in the scheduling area, 63% in pre-op, and 51% in the OR area.

Changing the Culture
Reformers argue that wrong-site surgeries can be prevented by changing the culture of the hospital or surgery center. "We have to think of wrong-site surgeries as a failure of the system, not of the individual," says Ron Savrin, MD, a general surgeon in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, who is a surgery subject matter expert for the Sullivan Group. "It should never be only up to one individual to stop an error from occurring." Seeing oneself as part of a team can reduce errors.  Wrong-site surgeries are often concentrated in certain hospitals ― even prestigious teaching hospitals are not immune. A decade ago, Rhode Island Hospital had five wrong-site surgeries in two years, and Boston's Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center had three wrong-spine surgeries within two months.

The Goal Is Zero Errors
Because reported information is spotty and no major studies on incidence have been conducted in recent years, "we don't have a clear idea," he says, "but my best guess is that the rate is declining. Absolute zero preventable errors has to be our goal," Savrin says. "We might not get there, but we can't stop trying.”

Note: Adapted from “MDs Doing Wrong-Site Surgery: Why Is It Still Happening?,” L. Page, Sept. 29, 2021, Medscape Medical News.

 
Thank you for your service!